A decision terminal that joins live asking evidence, DLD comparables, ownership, warm relationships, verified buyer mandates, and dated next actions.
Synthetic example. The mechanics and labels are identical to the protected terminal; no identity is exposed here.
Every view either supports selection, comparison, or an action.
A ranked queue and opportunity matrix expose where evidence and urgency intersect.
Price history, days listed, duplicate agents, timing, and DLD value gap are explicit.
Owner, agent, and exact warm-network paths appear with source and confidence.
Only active mandates participate. Hard mismatches are blocked before ranking.
Call, WhatsApp, email, viewing, offer, and opt-out produce dated action state.
The system is useful because it refuses to pretend an ambiguous listing is a known owner asset.
Exact email or normalized phone overlap, a distinct Palm registry code, or a reviewed unit-level resolution. These paths may affect access scoring.
Five or more relevant DLD transactions, a project-resolved listing, and verified mandate constraints. Useful for ranking with visible limitations.
Name-only overlaps, submarket fallbacks, and portal listings without unit evidence remain searchable but do not masquerade as owner proof.
Asks retain their source URL and timestamp. Rent appears only when observed or operator-verified. The score is fully decomposable.
Private names and contact evidence remain behind protected access.